This CLE program took place in the past. For information on upcoming low-cost CLE programs, please visit my main CLE page
Saturday, June 18, 2011 and Monday, June 20, 2011
Saturday, 12:50 - 4:00 PM
Monday, 8:45 AM - 4:05 PM
Community Meeting Room
Lower Level, Como Lakeside Pavilion
1360 North Lexington Parkway
St. Paul, Minnesota 55103
To help out those attorneys in Minnesota CLE category 3, who need to complete their CLE requirement by June 30, 2011, I'm offering a number of reasonably priced video replays in St. Paul on Saturday, June 18, and Monday, June 20. These programs include Ethics and Elimination of bias credits. The cost is only $25 per credit, and you may attend any portion of the program. Pre-registration is required for most of these programs, although you may pay by check at the door. Minnesota CLE credit has been approved for each individual program as shown below. The entire program, under the title "St. Paul Video Replays" has been approved for up to 12.0 Wisconsin CLE credits, including 4.5 ethics and professional responsibility credits.
Update: Walk-ins are welcome for all programs on Monday. To pay by credit card, please use the link below, since I'm unable to accept credit cards at the door. To pay by check, you may simply show up for as many credits as you need. If you need to contact me the day of the program, my cel phone at 651-285-5474.
|Date||Time||Course||Credits Approved||Originally Presented||MBCLE Event Code||Preregistration Required?|
|Sat. June 18||12:50-1:50||Ethics Refresher 2011: Part 6 of 6||1 Ethics||4/26/2011||157295||Preregistration recommended, but walk-ins welcome|
|Sat. June 18||1:55 - 2:55||Elimination of Bias: The Rules and an Ongoing Process||1 Elimination of Bias||5/17/2011||157296||Preregistration required|
|Sat. June 18||3:00 - 4:00||Recent 7th Circuit Decisions||1 Standard||9/18/2010||157297||Preregistration Required|
|Mon. June 20||8:45 - 11:45||Ethics Refresher 2011: Part 1||3 Ethics||4/2/2011||157318||Preregistration recommended, but walk-ins welcome|
|Mon. June 20||11:50 - 1:55||Nuts and Bolts of Minnesota Appellate Practice||2 Standard||06/13/11||157319||Preregistration recommended, but walk-ins welcome|
|Mon. June 20||2:00 - 3:00||Minnesota Supreme Court, Mar - April Decisions||1 Standard||5/10/2011||157320||Preregistration Recommended, but walk-ins welcome|
|Mon. June 20||3:05 - 4:05||Elimination of Bias: The Rules and an Ongoing Process||1 Elimination of Bias||5/17/2011||157321||Preregistration Recommended, but walk-ins welcome|
Ethics Refresher 2011 (Part 6 of 6). Saturday, 12:50 PM. This will be a comprehensive review of the Rules of Professional Conduct for attorneys in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Iowa. All three states have adopted substantially similar rules governing lawyers, and this course will review the rules as adopted in all three states. Where the rules differ, we will go over the differences. Seeing these differences is useful for the practitioner in that particular state, but also gives insight into the meaning of the rule in other states. And since the same model rules serve as the basis for most states’ rules, this course will provide practical guidance for attorneys in most U.S. jurisdictions. Many lawyers review the Rules in their entirety only once, and that is before they take the Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam in law school. But the rules change over the years and decades, and some of the finer points might be forgotten. Therefore, this course will serve as a useful refresher for the practitioner to avoid ethical pitfalls. This is part of a longer six-hour program, the second half of which is presented on various dates. One hour.
Elimination of Bias: The Rules and on Ongoing Process. Saturday, 1:55 PM, repeated Monday, 3:05 PM. We'll start by looking at the rules governing bias within the legal profession, which is a subject covered by both the General Rules of Practice and the Rules of Professional Conduct. We will then see how well we are collectively doing as a profession and legal system in abiding by those rules. We will do so through the eyes of participants at a series of community dialogues at which community members were asked to describe their experiences and discuss ideas for advancing racial equality and fairness in the courts. All participants are welcome to share their insights. This program will run sixty continuous minutes, will relate directly to the practice of law, and is designed to meet the first and third learning goals for elimination of bias courses: 1. To educate lawyers about the elimination of bias or prejudice in the legal profession, in the practice of law, and/or in the administration of justice; ... 3. To educate lawyers about the problems identified in the Supreme Court’s Race Bias and Gender Fairness Task Force Reports, as well as in other studies, reports or treatises which describe bias and prejudice in the legal profession, in the practice of law, and/or in the administration of justice. We will begin by referencing the Supreme Court's 1993 report on the elimination of bias in the judicial system, and we will also look at how both the Rules of Professional Conduct and the General Rules of Practice require us as lawyers to avoid bias. Then, we will look at how well we are doing in meeting these requirements, as seen by various communities, including communities of color. In particular, we'll examine the suggestions made by members of the public at community dialogues held over the past three years by the Supreme Court's Racial Fairness Committee. There will be opportunities for participants to discuss these suggestions, and to offer our own suggestions on how we can fulfill these professional obligations.
Recent Seventh Circuit Decisions Saturday, 3:05 PM. We'll be looking at recent noteworthy cases from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Topics include: Wisconsin Unfair Sales Act not preempted by Sherman Act; Wisconsin integrated bar compelled speech limitations; �heckler�s veto�; speech by student organizations; firearms possession by user of controlled substance; Wiretap Act; EEOC retaliation claim; and more. This program was originally presented on September 18, 2010. 1.0 Minnesota standard CLE credit approved; 1.0 Wisconsin CLE credits. For a copy of the course materials, click here.
Ethics Refresher 2011 (Part 1). Monday, 8:45 AM. This will be a comprehensive review of the Rules of Professional Conduct for attorneys in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Iowa. All three states have adopted substantially similar rules governing lawyers, and this course will review the rules as adopted in all three states. Where the rules differ, we will go over the differences. Seeing these differences is useful for the practitioner in that particular state, but also gives insight into the meaning of the rule in other states. And since the same model rules serve as the basis for most states’ rules, this course will provide practical guidance for attorneys in most U.S. jurisdictions. Many lawyers review the Rules in their entirety only once, and that is before they take the Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam in law school. But the rules change over the years and decades, and some of the finer points might be forgotten. Therefore, this course will serve as a useful refresher for the practitioner to avoid ethical pitfalls. This three hour segment is designed to satisfy the entire ethics requirement for the reporting period in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Iowa. This portion of the program covers Rules 1.0 through 4.4 (and Wisconsin Rule 4.5). It is also a part of a longer six-hour program, the second half of which is presented on various dates. Three hours.
Nuts and Bolts of Minnesota Appellate Practice. Monday, 11:50 AM. For the attorney unexpectedly faced with a case before the Minnesota Court of Appeals, it can be a daunting challenge. While the Minnesota Rules of Appellate Procedure are not onerous, they do impose requirements that might be very different from what the trial attorney is used to. In some cases, seemingly innocent violations of these rules can be disastrous. We’ll walk through the rules and give practical guidance on how to file a notice of appeal, how to order a transcript, how to write and assemble a brief, and even what color the brief’s cover needs to be, and how it should be bound. This course will put you at ease if you are ever required to file an appeal, or if the opposing party files an appeal in a case in which you prevailed. The course materials include detailed forms and checklists, and references to the rules. Two hours, five minutes.
Minnesota Supreme Court: March-April 2011 Decisions. This program will review the decisions of the Minnesota Supreme Court handed down during March and April, 2011. Topics include: Zoning ordinance modifying Rochester airport "safety zone" constitutes a taking since diminution in value of adjoining property was substantial. A mutual mistake of material fact does not warrant recision of the contract when the mistake is to mere value--even though the contract accidentally included two parcels of land worth twice the value of the contract. When consent is at issue, the court may receive expert testimony as to the typical behavior of sexual assault victims. We'll also look at when property is "acquired" by a tax-exempt entity so as to exempt the property from taxation. Finally, we'll take a look at the court's reluctant order of March 9 continuing the "temporary" $100 increase on Minnesota Attorney Registration fees. One hour.
Richard P. Clem has a B.A. in history from the University of Minnesota, and a J.D., cum laude, from Hamline University School of Law. He has been in private practice in the Twin Cities for over 20 years. His reported cases include: Asociacion Nacional de Pescadores a Pequena Escala o Artesanales de Colombia v. Dow Quimica de Colombia, 988 F.2d 559, rehearing denied, 5 F.3d 530 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1041 (1994); LaMott v. Apple Valley Health Care Center, 465 N.W.2d 585 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991); Abo el Ela v. State,468 N.W.2d 580 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991).
Minnesota CLE credit has been applied for as shown on the table above.
Como Lakeside Pavilion is located in Como Park, on the west side of Lake Como, on Lexington Parkway. From Interstate 94, take Lexington north 2.3 miles. From Minnesota Highway 36, take Lexington south 1.9 miles. Free parking is available in the two large lots near the Pavilion. There is additional free parking nearby in the lot on East Como Boulevard, and elsewhere in the park. Enter the building through the main caf� entrance on the parking lot level and take the elevator to the lower level. Outside food and beverages are not permitted, but coffee and a wide variety of food and beverages are available from Black Bear Crossings upstairs.
The cost of this program is $25 per credit, for as many or as few credits as you attend. To register, simply send an e-mail to me at email@example.com letting me know which program(s) you wish to attend. You may pay by check at the door.
You may also register securely online by following the "Buy Now" link below. If you have a PayPal account, you may sign and and use your PayPal account. If you do not have a PayPal account, of if you prefer to simply use a credit card, you may also do so by following this link. From the drop-down menu, please select the number of credit(s) you will be attending. In the comment field (or in a separate e-mail), please let me know which part(s) of the program you plan to attend.
If you have any questions, please e-mail me at firstname.lastname@example.org or call me at 612-378-7751.